How many times have you heard an "expert" claim you can't get bokeh with a M43 (micro four thirds) sensor, zoom lens or stopped down to more than f4?
Sometimes you just need to ignore those rules.
Sometimes you just need to ignore those rules.
Nothing brings the finer points of a debate into the spotlight than personal involvement.
The big AIart news of the last few days is that Stable AI will allow artist to opt out of being included in the next dataset being used to train the neural network to be used for Stable Diffusion 3. Well at least you can opt-out for the next couple of weeks, so follow this up now.
There is a site, that can check whether you have been included in the massive Laion-5B & Laion-400m neural networks used in Stable Diffusion & Google's Imogen, yes they were trained on 5.8 billion images. I haven't established its legitimacy as an ethical stance, but it does seem legit. It doesn't appear to be a sneaky way to get more images (with so much hacking and phising establishing trust is a big issue in the #AIart discussions)
It took me very little time using the image search feature, to find two of my works. They were part of my Retracing Darwin exhibition in early 2010 and very early examples of my personal technique I call photoimpression. I actually don't mind if others study my method and even create examples of their own. I would like them to acknowledge me, which is becoming a hollow wish on today's web. I don't blame redbubble either, I am sure they didn't know and/or had not given permission either,
I really don't want my work, especially my own special techniques, style, mark-making colouring or composition used without my permission. This is the stuff that makes my work original. Firstly because I know I'll never be acknowledged, that others could profit from this work or contribution to this work to what is presented as their original, I also actually find a lot of the so-called art generated by these AI's a bit scary and I don't approve, and finally I find the whole process a bit morally questionable and not ethical.
So I've made up my mind, Now I do want to opt out.
Damn! I have to do it image by image. Cest La Vie
It's December already and I'm still contemplating the Backtober idea. Something more distracting seems to arrive everytime I stop to consider a NAS (network storage) option, and I really haven't given trueNAS a real work-out yet either. What I have done is dropped back to the very old Grandfather, Father, Son Archive strategy from the days when anything off the computer was stored on large reels of magnetic tape. In those days Backup was rightly considered as different to Archive. Usually the backup set was in two parts Full (everything import) and Incremental (only those files that have changed since the last full backup).
The three disks on the green sleeve also act as my Backup set, they are kept on my desk under the shelf/alcove lifting up my monitor to eye level. They are normally not connected to any computer but can be. When I retrieve my grandfather copy from remote storage I immediately clean off the disk (a full format as that does checks of the disk for problems and will map out and mark any problem areas).
The developments in AI (well large-scale machine learning in natural language and image generation areas) have been astonishing. However, the "viral" usage seems to be sliding towards that all to common race to the bottom. Well, several bottoms, exploiting others to make money for nothing, chasing fame and likes, selling AIart as NFTs and now creating and selling books (children's stories in fact). All that as others question the ethics and legality of profiting off someone else's work.
Today I became aware of two books that have been raced into production using these AI tools. (I say this confidentially because the tools to create them have only been available in recent months and the better version in the last weeks)
"I think this book is a glimpse at what anyone can do with merely some AI software, basic Photoshop skills, and an idea. If my [idea] can be turned into a book, then I'm sure your far better ideas can, too!"
—Mark Terry of The Truth About Bees
Yet I do see that there is great potential for many artist being able to use these Ai tools as aids to improving their skills, helping with inspiration and understanding, and even making their own unique tools on a much smaller scale. As Alice's story says there is power in these tools which can be used for good and evil, depending on how they are guided (what they given to learn)
So I started thinking could Lunimar Neo's new-ish RelightAI tool help out? It has sliders for adding brightness near or far and/or warming to cooling again near or far. Whilst the result is definitely not yet spectacular but it is a definite improvement.
I couldn't help noticing a couple of items lower in the creative block was the Sunrays tool and I just couldn't help myself!
So that means the sunset was a little ordinary. BUT still great to watch it set.
You really don't have to photograph everything, just being there can and taking time to gather in the ambience is all you need. Way better than a selfie on your phone that you never look at again.