The impulse buy, that wasn't really

 Finally biting the bullet, I had undertaken a little review of what backup/archive space would cost at the moment, specifically on devices I owned. Using USB expansion style hard drives started at around AUD$ 32 to AUD$35 per TB (terabyte=1,000,000 megabytes) or 3.2 to 3.5 cents per GB (gigabyte=1000 megabytes), this was still way cheaper than SSD offering or even old fashion magnetic tape.

A driving force is that I will get close to a digital photo collection (including some movies) approaching 5 TB (terabytes) within the near future. However, my free storage capacity across a lot of hard drives was rapidly reducing below 2TB, and that made it difficult to maintain a 3-2-1 style archive/backup (three copies, on two different devices and one off-site). It has already slipped into a 2-1-1 method (2 copies, on one and a bit devices, one often off-site). I’ve got a couple of 2TB drives already in the backup cycle, so I reasoned two more 3 or 4TB drive would allow me to get back on track. Suddenly I started to see the same ads, from the same seller for such a USB hard drive embedded beside YouTube videos & on between photos on Instagram, damn you targeted marketing! 

But I'm sure I mostly ingored these ads. Until in a different electronic store by chance I saw the 4TB drives again but for a higher price.  I casually mentioned I had seen them cheaper and got an instant price match and even a little extra discount, damn again targeted advertising and slick salemanship. I decided quickly I bought two. 

Now to catch up on the important archiving and backing up that was sliping behind. No more excuses.

Prices have come down a little, as capacities have increased but things are relatively similar to my article back in 2018 The Myth that Digital Photography is free.

Creativity in name, not so much in practice

Whilst I have long since stopped using Lightroom and other Adobe products, I do still take a keen interest in what is going on at Adobe and more particularly what they are working on. So I have been attending the virtual aspects of adobe’s big MAX conference for the last few years.

Adobe CEO Shantanu Narayen described how the company is determined to develop "AI for social good” in his keynote address. They are certainly using AI within many of their tools. Creating a wealth of “one-click”, “fix-it”, “make it better” tools within their existing suites of applications. For sure it will take a lot of tedious hack work out of making visual images and video, but I don’t think this is going to re-assure the real creatives worried about the rise of AI art.

One really obvious theme is everything is moving to video (or at least animated images) and the general idea of creativity is all about building a social media space, going viral, capturing the hearts and mind in a few second, possible in a 2D becoming meta 3D style, design assets and brand kit consistency, again with that “single click” aspect dominating. Sounds like a lot of the sameness, everyone clicking on the same few links and expecting originally and creativity may actually result with more and more of the same!

The hyped “new” tool Adobe Express has a lot of the look and feel of Canva, perhaps with nicer integration with other adobe tools (so you need to pay more rent), The photographic enhancements in lightroom and photoshop are mainly not new and exciting, being offered in a number of other pieces of software, just not integrated so again you have to spend more renting it all. The sneaks segment usually my favourite to see what new technology might be coming up was a disappointment. Perhaps with the exception of project blink (for AI-powered video editing on the web)

I did like the short presentation by Relu Ou on "the myths and realities about Artifical Intelligence", Particularly his closing remark “Please let your imagination direct how you use these tools.”

Second Generation selfportrait

 A lot of people on the Internet express the opinion that artist will go extinct because of #AIart. I am not one of them.

AIart Selfportarit of Artist on the Beach
(Style tranfer of a photo using a stable diffusion reference)

The current crop of text to image neural networks can be quite amazing, very good at capturing style, colouring and texture aspects of artistic mark making. Not so good at expressing an artist intent, specifically originality. Unfortunately, most of the current neural networks I’ve been trained up on rather depressing and dystopian art and images. I’m not sure that this is really the direction of art, more to do with the wasteland of trends on social media, where most images are found these days. Further so much depends on how you express yourself in the text prompt and modifiers. Will poets become the new visual artists?  Further it’s become common practice to keep refining the image and prompt. This is a lot like building up glazes or over-painting, creating layers of added texture and form and more eye appeal.

Already I can see that the simple first attempt text string output on social media from any of the AIart systems around at the moment, looks much the same, not quite right, unusually cropped and frequently scarily dystopian. Hopefully those jumping on the “one-click” filter style of social media influencer posts will soon become bored with the method. Leaving those interested in the potential for artistic expression time to experiment and refine methods. Thereby expanding the range of tools and media they have to hand. I for one look forward to this time.

Inktober-ing to relieve the pain of trying to upload videos from a PC into Reels

I do realize that Instagram's reels are just meta/facebook's copy of Tik/Tok BUT why are they so tediously phone oriented. I have a good little project going where I was submitting the prompt "Am I an Artit Now?" to a variety of common AIart tools and felt it would make an interesting video. Which I still think it will.

However after a week of frustration trying to load & edit a decent reel from my PC, I've realise why should I even bother with such un-socialable media. So sorry folks if you are on instragram, you'll have to put up with my Inktober etchings for a while.

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by Norm Hanson (@normhansonart)

Backtober

I recently listened to a one of Brooks Jensen's "Here's a Thought" short daily podcasts called backtober  Its about how he uses October each year to thoroughly review his digital back up and archives. He might be a bit obsessive, replacing any spinning hard drive older than 3 years, never less it has made me realize I need to totally re-evaluate my situation.

I have not found a good solution to replacing my little NAS unit. So automatic daily backups are not being made anymore!

1. Most of my archiving is now on external (spinning disk) hard drives, and unfortunately, I have experienced 4 of these drives crashing in the past decade. There were duplicates of these so I didn't actually lose anything, Duplicates were on another hard drive (ie same format/technology)
2. I do have archives up to 2010 on CD & DVD, They take up lots of space and I haven't touched them in years.
3. I have a fairly complete "extra" archive on a larger old hard disk that I can connect into my "air gapped" linux archive. When recently accessed one of these older disks started reporting errors (and will have to be replaced, but I'm out of old computer drives!)
4. I haven't evaluated the FreeNAS software yet!

It's October so I need to get onto these now, I like the idea of a full review yearly rather than my irregular monthly attentions (which has been overlooked a few times this year anyway).

Unnatural Crops Explained

The developments in Text to Image AIart generated images are amazing. Things are changing, and largely improving in image quality almost weekly. However one thing I had noticed that was staying fairly constant was unnatural looking crops, the weird truncating of the subjects, particularly people. Surely this was not a new artistic trend I had no knowledge of, or perhaps the artist who's work is being used to train these systems had an aversion to conventional composition.

Example of a headless figure based on stable diffusion prompt

Am I an artist now? John Singer Sargent

Turns out there is a simpler explanation (see quote from a NovelAI blog post below). The unnatural crops are a result of the training set being converted to a square format (so the images are the same ratio) and just arbitrarily using the center of the image.

 Aspect Ratio Bucketing

One common issue of existing image generation models is that they are very prone to producing images with unnatural crops. This is due to the fact that these models are trained to produce square images. However, most photos and artworks are not square. However, the model can only work on images of the same size at the same time, and during training, it is common practice to operate on multiple training samples at once to optimize the efficiency of the GPUs used. As a compromise, square images are chosen, and during training, only the center of each image is cropped out and then shown to the image generation model as a training example.

Are we having fun yet?

It hasn't taken long for my AIart works to fall foul of the censors. Ok not the real censors, the perceived NFW (not for work, standards of the USA based morals on the internet) Whilst I can only see blur in one of the images generated, I expect that it was being interpreted as NUDITY. Which isn't surprising for anything Salvador Dali inspired

I also believe the warning is probably coming from Stable Diffusion itself. That might be a very good thing, indicating they are concerned with the ethics (aka complying with social norms) of the types of images they are being asked to generate. I do know that certain words are not allowed in the text submitted. Again, a bit restrictive but overall, a good thing.

Back to what I was playing with, just having fun. Which I learnt from a Catherine Price in a recent Ted Talk, involves Play, Connection & the Flow State. I like self-referential (meta) subject so I have submitted the phrase "Are we having fun yet?" Firstly the phrase just by itself and the results were totally underwhelming. Perhaps AI doesn't know what fun is yet?

Then by 3 well known artists  / cartoonists / photographers each as modifiers. The results are more encouraging. I've picked the most appropriate in each group of four thumbnails.

Moral: Be careful what you ask for!